First time here? Sign up for a free account or log in

Forums » Branding/Packaging » Topic


Long Term LPS Etiquette
tesla2's Avatargold
Mathew Whitney
tesla2

So let’s say you’ve been here a year or two and have racked up a dozen inventions entered into LPSs. Now there’s quarterly ASOTV LPSs. Should you put all of them in each time on the off chance? How many times are you gonna enter it?

We have to do some vetting of our own for the sake of Team EN. We had Green searches and now Pet searches overlapping. For LPSs that specific, sure its appropriato give your idea as many chances as possible…

I’m just thinking it may get to be logistically nighmarish for Team EN, we should try to balance our enthusiasm with their process.

posted November 04, 2009 11:24 (
)

Posting replies has been disabled
williamricely's Avatar
william ricely
williamricely

The real question is if EN submission “screeners” see the same idea submitted to EN twice, do they research it twice, or throw it in the “nope” pile the second time? Tesla… why no thought on lightning as electricity?

posted November 04, 2009 12:14 (
)
mger80's Avatargold
Margaret Pryor
mger80
215,500
Insider Points

Hey Mathew,

I was kind of wondering the same thing. As of now I just keep entering them. The reason I do is that I have gotten several different results so far. I had a few ideas that I have entered to ASOTV each time, and each time they have been kicked out at different points. I can’t help but wonder if it might make it further along in the process the next time. I still haven’t decided how many R’s it will take for me to consider it a dog though. :)

Another etiquette thought I have is about starting forum topcis. I wish EN would start an offical forum topic for each LPS when it is announced. I think that would help clear up which ASOTV, Petsmart, etc search we are posting to. Perhaps they could put a date with it or something to distinguish one from the other. It’s starting to get a bit confusing, especially when multiple people are starting topics for the same search.

posted November 04, 2009 13:30 (
)
emily123's Avatargold
Emily 123
emily123
77,000
Insider Points

I agree Margaret. I think it would be nice if each LPS had its own official topic…even if it didn’t have the “official” yellow tag. I’ve been an EN member since the beginning, and it was easy back then. Now that some companies are sponsoring multiple LPSs it can get confusing. Particularly for new members. Good suggestion! :)

Mathew- I have one invention that I’ve officially laid to rest…it’s a level 10, double-dog loser. It’s hit R4 with a sledge hammer too many times. It’s important to know when to let go… :)

posted November 04, 2009 16:16 (
)
williamricely's Avatar
william ricely
williamricely

Another good reason gold members should get some sort of feedback on certain lps’s Matt. Particlarly if an idea is X’d due to the dicovery of prior patents! (which I believe probably covers most R-4’s)

posted November 04, 2009 16:56 (
)
tesla2's Avatargold
Mathew Whitney
tesla2

Another thing I was wondering is…I want to enter an archived LPS entry to the Casting Call, can i just tell the panel to bring up the file as opposed to bringing my own laptop (not an option now)?

William, I have not adopted the name Tesla out of admiration alone, I have an affinity and several traits and abilities.

I have completed (intellectually) what he set out to do. Still waiting for the right people and funds to come together for the prototyping of this:

http://www.ufodigest.com/news/0808/crop-glyph-p...

posted November 05, 2009 09:07 (
)
williamricely's Avatar
william ricely
williamricely

Matt I agree that extracting power from the dark energy in the universe would be great… But do u think starting on a smaller scale could be achievable? ie. pretty big lightning rods on sky-scrapers conducting static electricity from the clouds to the ground before it has built up enough charge to arc as a bolt? Would that be possible? Or rather I guess what I’m asking is does a way exist to convert static electricity into usable electricity?

posted November 05, 2009 10:42 (
)
tesla2's Avatargold
Mathew Whitney
tesla2

Static electricity becomes dynamic via a spark but that is not harnessing Dark Energy. My invention uses an electrostatic field in a most unusual way. The Correa PAGD is the closest prior art to my AIR. Their discharge tube has an extra set of electrodes in the tube itself, I’m using an external “scroll electret” to produce the electrostatic field.

Is a breadbox size small enough?

posted November 10, 2009 07:48 (
)
williamricely's Avatar
william ricely
williamricely

So what is to stop an instant equallibrium twixt light and dark energy if u were to open a link between them?

posted November 10, 2009 07:57 (
)
tesla2's Avatargold
Mathew Whitney
tesla2

Great question, but it assumes some kind of polarity when there isn’t really one, there is, but there is also a continuous aspect. There are potentials and differences…Between Classic and quantum states, between the Heaviside and Poynting components, the battery (initial conditions), the bipolar spark gap.

Your question sounds like the matter/antimatter situation where you’d expect annhilation, but this does not happen. I think you just pointed out the most fundemental paradox of reality. How can it ALL BE ONE (Dark Energy State) and yet manifest as creation in 6 other phase states? What is the barrier between local space and hyperspace? Sub/super luminal?

Linear time and mass is the result of space wavering between oneness and manyness, the observer imposes distinction, determines difference.

Quantum coherent macroscopic systems, where many are one…lasers, condensates,…

posted November 12, 2009 09:31 (
)
williamricely's Avatar
william ricely
williamricely

Hey Matt, U sound very smart! I hope the AIR invention works, what do u need to test it? It seems we have momentarily taken over this thread, oh well EN knows what they’re doin, I’m sure they’ve got their own system to vet stuff. It would make sense to me that once a submissoin is reviewed by a screener one time, it should be automatically directed to the same person each time it’s submitted, where in which case, if they were already familiar with the idea, they could check it for any major changes (possibly automatically with the right program), and see their previous footnotes probably, then make a decision pretty quickly whether to advance it along or not. But dunno just a logical hunch. Ps. speaking of quantum leaps when an electron appears then dissappears from a shell level what if it was really a miniature universe big banging then contracting on a minute scale or visa-versa for our universe being a particle in a bigger universe? Haha or what are your thoughts on fractile universes?

posted November 18, 2009 09:45 (
)
tesla2's Avatargold
Mathew Whitney
tesla2

Check my pics for the HOLOFRACTALINE GUT. Time is fractaline as well, what does that mean? Some say time is linear, some say cyclical. Fractaline is BOTH. Things keep trucking forward, but novelty gets repeated in TIGHTER and TIGHTER loops until Judgement Day when all of history is compactified into a singular moment (the opening of the book of life) .

posted November 19, 2009 10:59 (
)
williamricely's Avatar
william ricely
williamricely

Matt I can’t get that chart to open up big enough to read it

posted November 20, 2009 08:43 (
)
tesla2's Avatargold
Mathew Whitney
tesla2

Yeah, feel free to download it and blow it up in the appropriate program. Also check out this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8IcciRHGvQ

posted November 20, 2009 09:41 (
)
Posting replies has been disabled

« Return to the forums index page