First time here? Sign up for a free account or log in

Forums » Market Research » Topic


Comparative Market Analysis (CMA)
chappy75's Avatargold
James Chapman
155,750
Insider Points

In my opinion business models and functions transcend industry boundaries. I find that a professional sales person is defined by his/her process as much as by the results they achieve. Though the results they achieve gain social status and develop a collective opinion of said sales person.

Many functions of the method I use in developing products are derived from my experience in sales and particularly from real estate. One of the duties that realtors have is in pricing listings (realtor’s inventory) to sell. There are several methods of determining price; the most commonly used is a “Comparative Market Analysis” the jargin for it is a CMA.

To do a CMA we call the property of interest the “subject” and the past performing (Sold, Active, Active w/contingencies [under contract]) property by a number. Now I will stop with the real estate portion but I want to show the similarity.

In determining price there is a top down and bottom up function. Top-down is what is from market perspective “Value”, what people are willing to pay. Bottom-up is from manufacturing “Cost” what it takes to create the product. The difference is your “Margin”. That Margin is the most important aspect when operating any business.

When doing a patent search it is less like a CMA and more like developing a Broker’s Price Opinion (BPO)… That is another subject, next time.

This is what I THINK and may not be necissarily true in practice. I am looking to complete that thought with Scott, Matt, Roger’s or anybody with industry experience input… Thank you.

Stay Thirsty, Stay Green!
~Chappy!

posted August 19, 2011 07:23 (
)


rogerbrown's Avataren_staff_badge
Roger Brown
Insider Points

One thing Inventors need to know is that even if you have all the data possible showing your costs, reason for pricing, etc the company licensing the product will run it through their own manufacturers to see if they can get a better deal. Samantha and Ralph are both right as far as you can out price yourself and people will pay more for quality and people will pay for a cheaper product if they see a use for it.
People will pay for items based on need, desire and percieved value.

posted August 21, 2011 10:36 (
)
countofmontecristo's Avatargold
Ralph Machesky
69,000
Insider Points

This is why I always try to have fully functional prototypes (if possible), toolling costs, packaging, distribution and others already done. By having several pieces of the puzzle already assembled, the big picture starts to look clearer. One of the other things I like to focus on are ‘repeat sales’. Not every product can be a repeat sale- some of the ones I’ll be submitting are, some are not meant to be sold that way.
By really looking into your market (is it a crowded space with lots of players or an empty lot with tumbleweeds blowing through) you get a better understanding of what you’re up against. Don’t be afraid to invent items that fill a need at a certain price point and or service level.

Example:
Tupperware and Rubbermade products are considered top end, durable, yet pricey. Someone comes along at invents a ‘new’ line of cheap containers that all can afford and you really don’t care if you leave a dish behind at a picnic or gathering. Many said there was no need for such an item, that it would never sell, blah, blah, blah. Guess what? That product sold so well that food producers /mfgs. are now using it to package/sell food items in and you can upscale the package (you keep and reuse it) when your done. That container is called ‘Gladware’ and it still sells to this day. Not as exspensive as Tupperware/Rubbermade and def not as durable…but it is still selling and being used. The lower end/simple Gladware took away a ‘huge’ slice of the market from the 2 kings because it focused on a segment of the market they didn’t and people wanted that.
Moral of this long-winded story: Invent what people are looking for now, and offer it to them at the right price and it will sell.

posted August 19, 2011 08:31 (
)
smorgan's Avatargold
SAMANTHA MORGAN
10,750
Insider Points

All true, Chappy!
I always wonder how much that “margin” affects our submissions. We might have a truly awesome product idea, but the cost of mfg. could be what ultimately gives us the boot with an “R4”. A person(s) may be able to invent… but not know how to figure the costs. Since EN does not give feedback at that level, the inventor remains ‘in the dark’ so to speak. Still, this should never deter someone from submitting to EN, because you just never know when the “Big One” will come along, anyone who has ever been fishing knows all about that!

posted August 19, 2011 07:58 (
)



« Return to the forums index page