First time here? Sign up for a free account or log in

Forums » Prototyping » Topic


Has anyone ever used Shapeways.com for prototypes?
cactusandy's Avatargold
Andrew Berger
61,500
Insider Points

Came across this website that looks interesting to create inexpensive prototypes through 3D printing….Has anyone ever used them?

http://www.shapeways.com/about/how_does_it_work

posted January 08, 2012 19:00 (
)


benco's Avatargold
Ben Cohen
40,000
Insider Points

I’ve used them. They have designs you can buy or you can create your own. I used them to make some small pieces. I wasn’t impressed with the quality, but I might give them one more try.

posted April 27, 2012 19:06 (
)
wirelessguy's Avatar
Ken Landau

I read a recent article from Popular Mechanics where they used shapeways.com to make a PM logo paperweight.

posted March 06, 2012 17:41 (
)
rion.motley's Avatar
Rion Motley

Derp.

@ Jack – depending on the 3D model’s nature, it can stand in for a physical prototype, yes.

For 3-D printing, you’ll need a volumetric model anyway, so it can’t hurt. Programs like CATIA and SolidWorks give you another edge, however. A 3D model can be “rigged” with all the mating components modeled as though they were physical entities, and largely obeying the laws of physics. You’re not exactly going to build a particle accelerator and discover the Higgs Boson in such a simulation, but for simple mechanical devices up to and including a jet engine, all the moving parts can be set in motion and shown off. Creating an animation from such a model is generally pretty straightforward. If you’ve ever seen youtube videos of objects being taken apart in a 3D rendering, it’s generally a piece of software like this that’s been used. There’s a few in particular that deal with firearms, and the whole gun is cut away and disassembled as it’s “firing” – something you can’t do with a physical model. Various chunks can be made transparent to show the operation of internal parts. Not a bad deal.

Nothing quite beats a physical prototype that actually works, but a 3D render of the device working as intended is a close second, particularly if you can get a quote on the manufacturing cost. CATIA and SolidWorks can generally generate tool paths for CNC machines, which for a molded part is exactly what you’d need, give or take the draft angles for the mold.

Hope that sheds some light on your situation ;-)

posted February 21, 2012 08:07 (
)
let-them-fly's Avatargold
Frank White
38,000
Insider Points

Jack,

3D Printing demonstrated: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7h09dTVkdw
posted February 19, 2012 20:09 (
)
brainstream's Avatargold
Todd Pagel
78,000
Insider Points

Jack,

I was looking through the Prototypes forum today and saw this link to a resource for do-it-yourself casting and molding supplies. Looked cool. Check out some of their video tutorials to see if it might be useful for you too.

http://www.alumilite.com/index.cfm

posted February 19, 2012 19:58 (
)
nimblejackenterprises's Avatar
Jack D'Alelio

Rion

You sound like an engineer. I’m trying to build a prototype now for an item that will end up being one piece molded out of silicone. My engineer friend did a nice drawing for me in the form of a 2D PDF doc. Are you suggesting a 3D drawing for use IN LIEU of a prototype, or as additional SUPPORT for a prototype? I think I’m going to have to mold the prototype somehow in order to test my concept. I’m just wondering if a good 3D drawing could be a reliable stand-in for an actual prototype as part of a submission process. Do you have any thoughts to add?

posted February 19, 2012 19:43 (
)
rion.motley's Avatar
Rion Motley

3D printing is EPIC.

Like any tool, though, it has its applications. Sometimes conventional machining operations are cheaper, but for items that would normally be injection molded or cast, a fused deposition modeling printer is about perfect, especially if you can integrate off-the-shelf components for moving parts.

I’ve seen some parts made by shapeways and other 3D printers (we had one at my college) and things like ball bearings were OK, but it would be better to design a part like that with a recess to accept a standard ball bearing, since there is a minimum resolution that leads to a little bit of slop/bumpiness to mating surfaces.

Otherwise, they’re pretty wicked in terms of quality, and not highway robbers when it comes to price, considering the alternatives ;-) (by alternatives I mean an injection molding rig that can cost tens of thousands of dollars for even a simple part geometry!)

posted February 19, 2012 19:23 (
)
ring-go's Avatargold
Michael Heagerty
404,500
Insider Points

Thanks Andrew, seems their site is down for a bit, but will check it out later.

posted January 08, 2012 19:50 (
)



« Return to the forums index page